{"id":957,"date":"2016-01-27T12:34:21","date_gmt":"2016-01-27T11:34:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/?p=957"},"modified":"2016-01-27T12:34:21","modified_gmt":"2016-01-27T11:34:21","slug":"site-firms-ordered-to-release-blacklisting-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/2016\/01\/27\/site-firms-ordered-to-release-blacklisting-information\/","title":{"rendered":"Site firms ordered to release blacklisting information"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A High Court judge has ordered 30 construction firms, including Sir Robert McAlpine and Balfour Beatty, to disclose all emails and correspondence linked to blacklisting of union reps and safety activists.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling came at the end of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.constructionenquirer.com\/2016\/01\/25\/high-court-orders-contractors-to-release-blacklist-data\/\">a two-day hearing<\/a> last week where it emerged that documents had been destroyed relating to firms\u2019 involvement with the illegal covert blacklister, the industry-controlled and financed Consulting Association. Firms and four individuals will now have to carry out costly searches of back-up computer tapes of emails to disclose any relevant information by 12 February. The court also ruled that contractors must pay costs for the hearing, estimated at up to \u00a3100,000.<\/p>\n<p>The union-backed High Court hearing is part of ongoing legal action on behalf of 168 blacklisted workers. It follows last October\u2019s unprecedented admission of guilt by construction firms.<\/p>\n<p>Howard Beckett director of legal services with the union <a href=\"http:\/\/www.unitetheunion.org\/news\/high-court-orders-construction-firms-to-release-blacklisting-information\/\">Unite<\/a>, commented: \u201cDespite admitting their guilt, it is shameful the lengths that some of the construction firms involved in blacklisting have gone to cover up their involvement.\u201d He added that the \u201cstain of blacklisting\u201d would not be fully removed \u201cuntil there is a full public inquiry and the livelihoods of the blacklisted is restored by the firms involved giving them a permanent job.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.morningstaronline.co.uk\/a-bda7-Blacklisters-pay-for-deleting-evidence#.VqindFkvtpk\">Dave Smith<\/a> of the Blacklist Support Group, whose members are also party to the court case, said: \u201cAll of the platitudes and half apologies, all their crocodile tears and claims of rogue managers from the companies over the past six or seven years are clearly nonsense. Documents have been destroyed and directors of multinational companies are hiding stuff on their laptops.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The former UCATT safety rep and blacklisted worker added: \u201cIt calls into question all of the promises made to Parliament and the High Court. I am not a lawyer but I would have thought that destroying evidence that would almost certainly have been used in a court case might be considered perverting the course of justice.\u201d<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A High Court judge has ordered 30 construction firms, including Sir Robert McAlpine and Balfour Beatty, to disclose all emails and correspondence linked to blacklisting of union reps and safety activists. The ruling came at the end of a two-day hearing last week where it emerged that documents had been destroyed relating to firms\u2019 involvement &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/2016\/01\/27\/site-firms-ordered-to-release-blacklisting-information\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Site firms ordered to release blacklisting information&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=957"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":958,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/957\/revisions\/958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}