{"id":347,"date":"2009-12-03T12:29:15","date_gmt":"2009-12-03T11:29:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/?p=347"},"modified":"2009-12-03T12:29:15","modified_gmt":"2009-12-03T11:29:15","slug":"%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/2009\/12\/03\/%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Disgraceful\u2019 blacklisting rules slammed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A top employment\u00a0law\u00a0expert has said the blacklisting law the government is now seeking to introduce is a \u201cdisgrace\u201d and \u201cnot worth having.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Professor Keith Ewing of Kings College London, the author of the UCATT commissioned report <em>Ruined Lives: blacklisting in UK construction industry, <\/em>said: \u201cThe government&#8217;s response is disgraceful. There has been no consultation. Consultation means engaging in a process with an open mind. They have not changed their mind on anything of substance and have allowed themselves to be driven by the few employers who responded.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A Blacklist Support Group spokesperson said the rules now going before parliament are \u201cvirtually the same as the original regulations the government introduced.\u201d He said the only positive change appears to be a minimum award of \u00a35,000 for any future blacklisting claims won at an employment tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>He expressed dismay that the government instead backs a call from the employer lobby to allow the use of lists for \u2018vetting\u2019 workers, so long as it is not illegal or not because of trade union membership, something also condemned by Professor Ewing.<\/p>\n<p>The professor said this \u201cextraordinary statement\u201d on vetting and the failure of the government to listen to submissions from blacklisted workers and unions mean \u201cin their present form the regulations are not worth having; they change nothing, give no new rights, and it\u2019s is a delusion to think otherwise.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.fack.org.uk\/\">Families Against Corporate Killing<\/a> (FACK) spokesperson Hilda Palmer also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.morningstaronline.co.uk\/index.php\/news\/content\/view\/full\/84003\">expressed disappointment<\/a> with the proposals. \u201cIt only talks about trade union members &#8211; the regulations must refer to all workers,\u201d she said: \u201cWe also called for any firm found guilty of blacklisting to be debarred from bidding for government contracts and for penalties to be much more severe.\u201d<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A top employment\u00a0law\u00a0expert has said the blacklisting law the government is now seeking to introduce is a \u201cdisgrace\u201d and \u201cnot worth having.\u201d Professor Keith Ewing of Kings College London, the author of the UCATT commissioned report Ruined Lives: blacklisting in UK construction industry, said: \u201cThe government&#8217;s response is disgraceful. There has been no consultation. Consultation &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/2009\/12\/03\/%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;\u2018Disgraceful\u2019 blacklisting rules slammed&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":348,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347\/revisions\/348"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hazards.org\/blacklistblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}