Campaigners condemn lack of blacklisting protection

Campaigners have condemned the lack of protection given by UK employment law to trade unionists falling victim of employer blacklists. They were speaking out after an 8 March written judgement from the first full-merits blacklisting Employment Tribunal, Dooley v Balfour Beatty, found in favour of the company.

Balfour Beatty did not deny using an illegally compiled blacklist to target bricklayer and union activist Mick Dooley. Instead it used documents it had made available to disgraced and now shutdown blacklisting organisation The Consulting Association in its tribunal submission.

While the judge, Mr BT Charlton, described blacklisting as “ghastly”, he found in favour of the construction giant because while Balfour Beatty has sought Mick Dooley’s dismissal, it wasn’t his actual employer – and the law only covers employees.

According to campaign group the Blacklist Support Group: “In an industry where sub-contracting and agency labour is widespread, this effectively allows the major multi-nationals such as Balfour Beatty, Sir Robert Mc Alpine, Skanska and Costain to blacklist workers who complain about safety or unpaid wages with impunity (as almost all labour is sub-contracted out).”

A spokesperson for the group said: “The Dooley decision and the new Blacklisting Regulations are basically a get out of jail free card for the major contractors. The blacklisters can hide behind the fact that they sub-contract most of the labour on major projects to escape any kind of legal responsibility.

“The new regulations will not make an ounce of difference to the likelihood of success for any blacklisted building worker seeking legal redress. If the new Regulations fail to make any difference for workers who can prove they have been blacklisted, what is their purpose?”

The Consulting Association “conspiracy” is a clear breach of Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights, he added. “The Blacklist Support Group send out an unambiguous message today: if our human rights cannot be upheld in the UK courts or from UK Regulations, then we will be taking our claims to the European Court of Human Rights. We have suffered for many years: we are prepared to fight all the way.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Edward Murphy
    Posted 11 March, 2010 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    I know of sub-contractors that have been “asked” by the main contractor, to remove, or not employ, a certain individual just through his national insurance number. The information supplied to the main contractor may not even be accurate, but these arbitrary decisions stick.
    I would not call this tribunal chairman a judge, purely on the basis that a judge is supposed to show intelligence and impartiality, both lacking as shown in this individual’s decision.
    It’s business as usual, I’m afraid!

  2. anthony lee
    Posted 15 March, 2010 at 3:55 am | Permalink

    i was kept out of work for twelve years, can you ever imageing what this doe’s to you your children. i was a very skilled steel erector. i had held charge/hand posistions, and leading hand, building rigs in the north sea. i went to work o sullom voe oil terminal in 1979. i was shop steward. after 18 months i was made redundant. i was kept out of work for 12 years. this was through WIMPEY MECHANICAL. No one knows what this does unles it happens to them. it will still go on, and on.

  3. Dave
    Posted 15 March, 2010 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Hi Tony
    have you got hold of your Consuling Association blacklist file yet?
    Blacklist Support Group

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>