<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ‘Disgraceful’ blacklisting rules slammed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/2009/12/03/%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/2009/12/03/%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed/</link>
	<description>This blog is brought to you courtesy of Hazards magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/2009/12/03/%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/?p=347#comment-312</guid>
		<description>As a certain number of these &#039;employers&#039; have recently pleaded guilty, in court, to cover pricing on tenders to local councils around the country, and are STILL allowed to tender for local authority work, then the chances of debarring them on past and future blacklisting is fanciful in the extreme, especially with the record of this NEW Labour government on employment rights over the last twelve years. You knew where you were with the Tories, and you most certainly know where you are with this crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a certain number of these &#8216;employers&#8217; have recently pleaded guilty, in court, to cover pricing on tenders to local councils around the country, and are STILL allowed to tender for local authority work, then the chances of debarring them on past and future blacklisting is fanciful in the extreme, especially with the record of this NEW Labour government on employment rights over the last twelve years. You knew where you were with the Tories, and you most certainly know where you are with this crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Houlihan</title>
		<link>http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/2009/12/03/%e2%80%98disgraceful%e2%80%99-blacklisting-rules-slammed/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Houlihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/?p=347#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I am in total agreement with the learned Professor.  The opportunity to introduce an effective bar on blacklisting will have been missed and who knows when the legislators will be persuaded to revisit this highly contentious issue.  It seems as if the Employers have the ear of Gov&#039;t and the victims, past&amp; future, of this pernicious practice have been sidelined once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in total agreement with the learned Professor.  The opportunity to introduce an effective bar on blacklisting will have been missed and who knows when the legislators will be persuaded to revisit this highly contentious issue.  It seems as if the Employers have the ear of Gov&#8217;t and the victims, past&amp; future, of this pernicious practice have been sidelined once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

